| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | |||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Social Groups | |||
![]() |
Registered
Members: 43,028 | Total Threads: 40,083 | Total Posts: 471,017 Currently Active Users: 2640 (4 members and 2636 guests) Welcome to our newest member, Esmeraldossyc |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Grown up member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 25
|
Hi,
just about to start a rebuild of a kv quattro and before doing the standard brakes up, is there a suitable upgrade for this model?? ta jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 1,809
|
In my experience, almost all requests for engine tweaks come from people with under-performing engines or ECUs in limp home mode, and almost all brake upgrade requests come from people with underperforming brake systems. Audi are pretty good engineers and the TueV won't let anything substandard onto the road - unless you're involved in some kind of motorsport it's usually more than enough to get it to do what it says on the tin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
4 ring whore!
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wirral
Posts: 3,910
|
280mm front and 256mm rears certainly brought mine upto modern day performance so less worried when someone in front brakes sharply pushing the standard Cq brakes to the limit. Have an article on the upgrade from VW Audi driver if you PM e-mail address..
__________________
![]() Coupe quattro 1986:-~450bhp + loooong list of mods! Audi A7 Bi-TDI SLine Black edition 2015 mapped to produce 600lb/ft torque! Audi S4 4.2 V8 cabriolet 2004:- |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Grown up member
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perthshire
Posts: 604
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
B5 RS4 88 Pearl White MB Ur quattro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Black Coupe Collector
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Towcestershiresheer
Posts: 2,933
|
Quote:
the brakes in general are perfectly good in standard form with 136bhp the best mod to mine was replace the flexi hoses that made a world of difference on oe discs and pads that was better than new discs and pads all round!
__________________
95 UrS6 87 Coupe Quattro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 1,809
|
The KV has better throttle response than any ur-quattro engine.
The KV's equivalent of the limp home problem is the vacuum unit on the distributor. I reckon as many as a fifth in the UK have leaky diaphragms. It's getting hard to find a car - turbo or not - that passes the MityVac tests. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Grown up member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 25
|
I don't think i'll get 300bhp from the 2.2 but if you reckon the original brakes are good when working right , that should be good enough. As i believe the engine is not easily tuneable??
P.S. thanks for quick replies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Grown up member
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: antrim, ireland
Posts: 504
|
exspensive!!! do a little searching on here and the infos there. i asked before but the kv is a bit pricey to tune sadly but it does sound brilliant. btw where are you in the north??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Grown up member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 25
|
In Dromore co-down , but work in aldergrove.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
==>PUGSPORT!<==
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Leyland
Posts: 1,544
|
changing from rubber to flexi stainless brake lines will make abit of difference. I'm selling a full EBC brake setup thats virtually brand new. Discs and pads all round. £150+postage, cost £227 posted but been sat in boxes!
__________________
1986 UR Quattro - (1982) Lombard RAC Group 4 recreation - #24 H.Demuth/J.Daniels 1981 VW mk1 golf GTi - now 5cylinder and RWD. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|