Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Social Groups |
Registered
Members: 13,762 | Total Threads: 40,056 | Total Posts: 470,826 Currently Active Users: 614 (20 members and 594 guests) Welcome to our newest member, ozihajuma |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
07-06-18, 07:50 PM | #1 | |
4 ring whore!
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Scottish Borders.
Posts: 7,520
|
80 estate 2.0 petrol
Nice looking cheap load-lugger for someone!...…...and low miles to boot(it is an estate!)
|
|
07-06-18, 08:50 PM | #2 |
4 ring whore!
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Kernow, Gods own county !!
Posts: 2,388
|
Looks good to me too....... :-)
|
07-06-18, 08:51 PM | #3 |
4 ring whore!
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Stockport
Posts: 2,348
|
Like
__________________
1992 80 quattro 20vt |
07-06-18, 10:12 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,157
|
Hate the 2.0 petrol in these (sorry I will run for cover now)
Otherwise, nice find |
08-06-18, 05:27 AM | #5 |
4 ring whore!
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Kernow, Gods own county !!
Posts: 2,388
|
So what would be your choice......for me in an ideal world a 2.3 engine but I don't think they ever did that with this model.....and of course quattro drive too.
|
08-06-18, 07:36 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Classic Audi Club Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,157
|
Quote:
But yeah, that's just personal preference based on what I have owned so far and what I am yet to own. |
|
08-06-18, 08:15 AM | #7 |
Grown up member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Morayshire
Posts: 229
|
Yes I'd definitely prefer a 2.3 5 pot in my 2.0 avant, as 114bhp is a bit tiresome compared to my 280 bhp S2....
that said with its straight thro' exhaust and Scorpion backbox it makes the lowly 8v lump more 'interesting', if primitive. Fuel consumption is pleasantly better however! |
Bookmarks |
|
|