Thread: 94 16v Coupe
View Single Post
Old 11-12-10, 12:06 AM   #5
Rapidresto
Grown up member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Telford
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coxy View Post
seriously would go for the latter.

Read up on CLK 320's (and most Merc's from late 90's to early 2000) as they rust like the proverbial.
And remember, the CLK was a £35k car new, and still has £35k+ running costs.
yep well up on the clk rust issues, mainly cosmetic really but servicing on either will prob be about the same and mpg is the same too. That said, there's some nice impreza's about for cheap money (avoiding all the modded and chavved up stuff).
Rapidresto is offline   Reply With Quote